Home Finance Wirecard: the case towards Markus Braun

Wirecard: the case towards Markus Braun

Wirecard: the case towards Markus Braun

Sharing is caring!

In March 2020, as Wirecard fought to persuade the world that its enterprise was not constructed on a fraud, George-Alexander Trümper, the corporate’s head of authorized, noticed what he thought was a major problem.

Chief government Markus Braun and different main executives on the German funds firm had been in search of methods to keep away from writing down a €100mn mortgage granted on questionable phrases to a small enterprise companion. Trümper believed that their plan was unlawful.

Trümper and his crew warned Braun and the opposite executives {that a} deliberate repackaging of the mortgage could be a breach of their fiduciary obligation. And he hinted concerning the potential penalties in the event that they had been to take action.

“[They] will take the danger, let’s guess over a field of champagne,” he wrote to a colleague in a chat message seen by the Monetary Occasions. Referring to Braun, he added: “MB all the time says that he has one foot in jail anyway.”

Two years later, after a spectacular accounting scandal that disgraced the nation’s banks, funding funds, regulators, auditors and police, Trümper’s prediction has proved prescient.

Markus Braun, CEO of Wirecard, during a break in his testimony to the German parliamentary committee in Berlin in November 2020
Markus Braun, chief government of Wirecard, throughout a break in his testimony to the German parliamentary committee in Berlin in November 2020 © Filip Singer/EPA-EFE

Prosecutors charged Braun on March 10 with fraud, breach of belief, account rigging and market manipulation, crimes carrying a possible sentence of as much as 15 years below German regulation. The circumstances across the mortgage are more likely to be a part of the felony case towards the previous chief government. Braun’s attorneys say his shopper shouldn’t be responsible.

Braun has swapped his life as a paper billionaire, whizzing on non-public jets between his mansions at Saint Tropez, Kitzbühel, Vienna and Munich, for a nine-square-metre Bavarian jail cell on the sting of Augsburg. Initially launched on bail in June 2020, he was rearrested in July as he’s thought of a flight threat. Throughout the pandemic the 53-year-old was not allowed guests and at occasions restricted to only two hours of personal cellphone calls monthly.

For any outsider, the case towards “Doktor Braun”, because the chief government was often addressed by his underlings, may seem open and shut.

Price €24bn at its peak, Wirecard crashed into insolvency in June 2020 with money owed of greater than €3bn. The Austrian, who joined Wirecard in 2002 from KPMG and rose to develop into chief government and the one largest shareholder, was the towering determine on the funds firm that over years hoodwinked auditors with solid paperwork, hounded critical journalists and traders, stifled inner investigations and fired whistleblowers.

But whereas the reason for Wirecard’s collapse was clear reduce — half the group’s gross sales and €1.9bn of the money on its stability sheet had been fictional — the case towards Braun shouldn’t be.

In Munich, a crew of greater than 20 prosecutors and police spent 21 months grinding by the advanced scandal, which includes dozens of suspects and corporations in about 25 international locations, together with Singapore, the Philippines, Mauritius, Belarus and Russia. German regulation enforcement held 450 interviews with witnesses and suspects, raided 40 properties and despatched out 90 requests for co-operation to international colleagues. The indictment towards Braun filed in regional court docket, which isn’t public, stretches to 474 pages.

Folders with records at a Bundestag inquiry into the Wirecard scandal in Berlin in April 2021
Folders with data at a Bundestag inquiry into the Wirecard scandal in Berlin, April 2021 © Christian Marquardt/EPA-EFE

Nonetheless, an individual conversant in the prosecutors’ pondering acknowledges that the tons of emails, chat protocols and different knowledge didn’t produce what they name “the smoking gun”.

Braun is anticipated to argue in court docket that he, too, was the sufferer of the fraud and never the perpetrator, his PR adviser, Dirk Metz, stated in an announcement given after his shopper was charged.

The investigation has proven how troublesome it’s to construct a felony case that includes advanced fraud. “The bar for German judges is especially excessive as they should show the non-public function of an government working a fraudulent agency,” says Fabio De Masi, a former MP who sat on the parliamentary inquiry committee into the collapse of Wirecard.

Witness for the prosecution

The trial towards Braun is more likely to begin within the autumn in Munich, the place a panel of 5 judges — three skilled and two lay members — will preside over hearings that might drag on for a number of years, say individuals conversant in the investigation, given the complexity and variety of witnesses.

For now, Braun is the one member of the corporate’s government board to be charged. The 2 different males indicted alongside him had been Stephan von Erffa, Wirecard’s former head of accounting and deputy finance director who beforehand denied any information of fraud at a listening to in parliament, and a former Dubai-based government, who turned chief witness towards Braun and can’t be named for authorized causes.

The trio are accused of being a part of a felony conspiracy that fraudulently inflated Wirecard’s stability sheet by faking outsourced enterprise in Asia that by no means existed. The alleged intention was to lure banks and traders to supply fairness and loans, to inflate the Wirecard share value and to cover that the corporate’s actual operations misplaced cash.

Braun is adamant that he’s harmless and that he’s additionally a sufferer of the fraud. He efficiently sued to make use of his administrators’ legal responsibility insurance coverage to cowl his authorized payments, together with the prices for an exterior PR adviser. He’s being represented by one in all Germany’s main white-collar crime attorneys, Wiesbaden-based Alfred Dierlamm.

Braun “was by no means a part of a gang that embezzled thousands and thousands of euros behind his again” and “didn’t know something concerning the machinations about this gang not to mention benefited from it,” Metz stated after the previous chief government was charged.

Wirecard’s former headquarters in Aschheim, Munich
Wirecard’s former headquarters in Aschheim, Munich. Price €24bn at its peak, the corporate crashed into insolvency in June 2020 with money owed of greater than €3bn © Alexander Pohl/Shutterstock

Braun blames an individual who, for now, is unavailable for questioning: Jan Marsalek, Wirecard’s former second-in-command who absconded in June 2020. The day after EY refused to log off Wirecard’s accounts, Marsalek boarded a personal jet at a small airfield in Austria, paid the pilots in money and flew to Minsk in Belarus. Since then there was no hint of him.

Munich prosecutors consider that he’s most probably hiding in Russia, in accordance with an individual conversant in their ideas.

Marsalek shouldn’t be the one suspect who can’t be heard. Christopher Bauer, a German citizen and Manila resident who was in command of one of many outsourcing companions that generated quite a lot of Wirecard’s pretend income, was declared lifeless within the Philippines weeks after the corporate’s collapse.

The case towards Braun will probably be primarily based partly on his dominant place within the firm — and his public insistence that Wirecard’s funds had been strong.

Described by colleagues as a “management freak” who wished to be personally concerned even in minute particulars at Wirecard, Braun repeatedly gave public statements that exterior attorneys, the auditor EY and the supervisory board deemed deceptive, in accordance with communications with Wirecard seen by the FT.

For example, after the FT reported in October 2019 that a few of Wirecard’s biggest customers did not really exist, he dismissed the article out of hand. “We, after all, know precisely what’s within the books,” he instructed analysts and claimed that “we fully analysed these allegations, went into all particulars of service provider relationships within the subsidiaries that had been addressed . . . And we will completely verify in the present day that every one of those allegations are unfounded.”

What Braun stated in non-public to Marsalek is unknown. They and different Wirecard executives had been heavy customers of the Telegram messaging app, however nearly all of these chats have been deleted, in accordance with a number of individuals conversant in the case.

Given the dearth of direct proof, the German prosecutor’s case hinges closely on a Marsalek confidant who has turned chief witness: a former Dubai-based government who ran the Wirecard unit on the coronary heart of the corporate’s fraud from his house in Dubai’s Burj Khalifa, the world’s tallest constructing.

Alexander von Knoop, chief financial officer of Wirecard
An inner lawyer alleged he had defined the board’s fiduciary duties ‘definitely 20 occasions’ to Alexander von Knoop, pictured, Wirecard’s chief monetary officer © Michaela Handrek-Rehle/Bloomberg

After Wirecard’s implosion, he voluntarily travelled to Germany and handed himself in. Charged alongside Braun, he incriminated his former boss, accusing him of being the architect of the fraud. The absence of others ready or keen to testify means it’s going to primarily be the phrase of this chief witness’ towards that of his former boss.

One of many key questions could be the extent of shut contacts between Braun and the Dubai-based supervisor testifying towards him. Braun instructed prosecutors there was none. Nonetheless, that assertion is at odds with testimony given by a number of different witnesses, together with Braun’s former chauffeur and the group’s head of compliance, who described work-related conferences between the 2, in accordance with paperwork seen by the FT.

As well as, chat messages between Braun and the chief witness within the run-up to the collapse, which had been submitted as proof by the witness’s lawyer, counsel that each had been in common communication, in accordance with an individual conversant in the case.

Braun’s lawyer is anticipated to assault the credibility of the chief witness, as his testimony was given from reminiscence with none entry to information and diaries, and initially got here with factual errors and contradictions corrected retrospectively, in accordance with individuals conversant in the case.

The trial can also be more likely to deal with €4.5mn of Wirecard funds the Dubai supervisor diverted to a secret Liechtenstein-based private basis, which Braun’s attorneys declare was not instantly disclosed to regulation enforcement authorities. Different individuals conversant in the case, nevertheless, state that prosecutors had been conscious of the muse even earlier than questioning the chief witness and made that clear to him.

On the core of the prosecution case towards Braun is the query of what he knew about Wirecard’s outsourced operations in Asia and whether or not he was conscious that they didn’t exist. On paper, these companies generated half of the group’s annual income, all of its working revenue and €1.9bn of company money held in escrow accounts in Asia.

Braun has insisted that the so-called TPA — or third-party acquirer — enterprise existed and was in sturdy monetary well being. He claims that its proceeds had been siphoned off by Marsalek and a gaggle of associates that embody the chief witness.

Braun argues they created a “shadow construction” and redirected Wirecard funds into their very own pockets completely with out the chief government’s information. As key proof, his attorneys level to €1.4bn in funds to Wirecard’s outsourcing companions and different offshore entities between 2015 and 2020, some €900mn of which had been cleared by accounts of Wirecard Financial institution, in accordance with individuals conversant in the case.

The previous chief government is anticipated to say that this cash represents Wirecard income from the TPA enterprise. He will even declare that prosecutors didn’t examine the origin and whereabouts of these funds, in accordance with individuals conversant in the matter.

Nonetheless, it appears Braun’s argument shouldn’t be corroborated by consultants who’ve been concerned within the firm since its collapse.

Michael Jaffé, Wirecard’s administrator, argued in a civil court docket submitting introduced towards the chief board in December and seen by the FT that there was “no proof in anyway indicating that Wirecard’s purported TPA enterprise . . . did the truth is exist in a significant manner”. Jaffé added that “all additional investigations confirmed that this was not the case”. Neither Visa nor Mastercard may discover transactions, which Wirecard stated had gone by their system and had been submitted throughout a forensic special audit conducted by KPMG as a proof that its enterprise was actual.

Prosecutors and the administrator have indicated that they think the €1.4bn of funds to outsourcing companions, which Braun sees as proof that the operations existed, had been the truth is funds that had been shuffled forwards and backwards to simulate actual enterprise.

A €100mn mortgage on the coronary heart of the case

Prosecutors are additionally more likely to deal with the €100mn mortgage, which so fearful Trümper, the previous head of authorized. Braun authorized the mortgage — which was ultimately rubber-stamped by the total government board. The corporate subsequently lent a further €100mn to the identical borrower, a Singapore-based funds group referred to as Ocap.

Particularly, Braun’s defence must handle the cash flows, which benefited him personally. In March 2020, €35mn of funds lent to Ocap was transferred to Marsalek, who then wired it on to Braun who used it to repay a private mortgage. The chief government desperately wanted the money to repay a €35mn mortgage from Wirecard Financial institution, which had been taken out with out the supervisory board’s approval. Throughout questioning Braun instructed Munich prosecutors that he was not conscious that the €35mn paid by Marsalek was in impact Wirecard funds, including that he was devastated when he first learnt it.

Ocap was supposed to make use of the cash borrowed from Wirecard to fund short-term financing for its service provider purchasers. Nonetheless, Wirecard Financial institution warned early on that Ocap was unfit to supply such merchandise because it lacked the technical experience. But, in accordance with paperwork seen by the FT, Braun and Marsalek in 2018 ignored a proper requirement to hunt the approval of all 4 government board members to log off the mortgage. This was solely rectified retrospectively two years later. Ocap filed for insolvency within the wake of the Wirecard collapse.

“A authentic enterprise goal [for that loan] is elusive. Mortgage functions don’t exist. There’s not even a documentation that Ocap inquired for cash within the first place,” the administrator states in a court docket submitting seen by the FT, including that it was “seen” that the cash wouldn’t be used for authentic functions.

When a Wirecard Financial institution government raised considerations in 2018 over the primary large mortgage to Ocap, which later turned bitter, Braun despatched a terse e-mail seen by the FT, telling him that “I instantly instruct you on behalf of Wirecard AG to implement the €100mn Ocap cash switch with none additional delay”.

An inner lawyer instructed Trümper in March 2020 that he had defined the board’s fiduciary duties “definitely 20 occasions” to the finance director Alexander von Knoop, together with “potential felony penalties”.

Trümper’s sardonic response again then: “Effectively, then a minimum of he can’t declare he has been at midnight.” The case towards Braun will depend upon whether or not he can persuade the judges that he truly was “at midnight”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

twenty − 11 =

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.